History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ditson v. Randall
33 Me. 202
Me.
1851
Check Treatment
Tenney, J., orally.—

We cannot assume that the horse was put away feloniously. We are at liberty only, to conclude from the statement of facts, that it was done fraudulently. And the doctrine is, that the vendor of a chattel, though the sale was procured by the fraudulent conduct of the vendee, cannot reclaim the property from a subsequent innocent purchaser.

Judgment for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Ditson v. Randall
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1851
Citation: 33 Me. 202
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.