DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. QUINN.
No. 2014-2159
Supreme Court of Ohio
April 29, 2016
2016-Ohio-2737
Submitted April 26, 2016
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 16, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with
{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O‘NEILL, JJ., concur.
