Disciplinary Counsel v. LargeDisciplinary Counsel v. Large
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 6, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022, 907 N.E.2d 1162.