DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BARTELS.
No. 2015-1638
Supreme Court of Ohio
June 22, 2017
2017-Ohio-4432 | 151 Ohio St.3d 1284
Submitted June 20, 2017
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 14, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order, relator, disciplinary counsel, shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent‘s monitor, in accordance with
{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in
{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Bartels, 151 Ohio St.3d 144, 2016-Ohio-3333, 87 N.E.3d 155.
O‘CONNOR, C.J., and O‘DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, O‘NEILL, FISCHER, and DEWINE, JJ., concur.
