History
  • No items yet
midpage
199 So. 3d 526
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2016
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure and remand for entry of an involuntary dismissal. There was no proof at trial that the original plaintiff, JP Morgan Chase, had standing to foreclose when it filed the original complaint. See Snyder v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n., 169 *527So.3d 1270, 1271-74 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (holding that Chase failed to prove standing where it did not prove it had possession of the note when it filed suit, and rejecting the argument that Chase established its right to foreclose through the Purchase Agreement between the FDIC and Chase for the assets of WAMU). In light of this disposition, it is unnecessary to reach the other issues raised on appeal.

Reversed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Diroberto v. Bayview Loan Services LLC
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 7, 2016
Citations: 199 So. 3d 526; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13454; 2016 WL 4699432; No. 4D15-749
Docket Number: No. 4D15-749
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Diroberto v. Bayview Loan Services LLC, 199 So. 3d 526