History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Davis
290 N.Y. 745
NY
1943
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: A question under the Constitution of the United States was presented and necessarily passed upon. The respondents contended that the judgment of the Trial Court, which granted the injunctive relief against the respondents, *Page 746 violated the constitutional rights of the respondents under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that said judgment did not violate the constitutional rights of the respondents under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. (See 290 N.Y. 101.)

Case Details

Case Name: Dinny & Robbins, Inc. v. Davis
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 15, 1943
Citation: 290 N.Y. 745
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.