History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dimarco v. Smith
90 N.H. 378
N.H.
1939
Check Treatment

"It is common learning that a party obtaining a responsive answer to a question asked by himself has waived objection by the very asking." 5 Wig. Ev., (1st ed.), 14. If the rule has any exceptions, the case here is not within them.

Furthermore, although evidence that a party is or is not insured against the liability for which he is sued is incompetent, yet "The fact of insurance may incidentally and unavoidably appear." Piechuck v. Magusiak,82 N.H. 429, 431. The evidence therefore does not necessarily render the trial unfair. Emerson v. Cobb, 88 N.H. 199, *Page 379 202. The plaintiff did not seek to have the evidence stricken out and the jury instructed to disregard it. If not estopped by eliciting the evidence, he cannot maintain that it constituted incurable error as matter of law.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Dimarco v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Nov 7, 1939
Citation: 90 N.H. 378
Docket Number: No. 3107.
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.