Dilluvio v. City of New YorkDilluvio v. City of New York
Nov 30, 2000
Versions:95 N.Y.2d 928744 N.E.2d 138721 N.Y.S.2d 6032000 N.Y. LEXIS 3581
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
The Appellate Division correctly determined that, as a matter of law, the accident did not result from an elevation-related risk
(see, Bond v York Hunter Constr.,
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.