History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. Downs
141 S.E. 570
N.C.
1928
Check Treatment

Civil action in ejectment and to enjoin the defendant from cutting timber on a certain tract of land described in the complaint.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. *Page 190 There are at least two exceptive assignments of error appearing on the record which make it necessary to remand the cause for another hearing.

The court instructed, the jury, inter alia, that in the present action the burden was on the plaintiff to show (1) title out of the State, and (2) adverse possession for seven years under color, or for twenty-one years without color. These instructions, as given, were erroneous.

In actions involving title to real property, where the State is not a party, other than in trials of protested entries laid for the purpose of obtaining grants, the title is conclusively presumed to be out of the State, and neither party is required to show such fact, though either may do so. C. S., 426; Moore v. Miller, 179 N.C. 396, 102 S.E. 627; Pennellv. Brookshire, 193 N.C. 73, 136 S.E. 257.

And in actions between individual litigants, as here, when one claims title to land by adverse possession and shows such possession (1) for seven years under color, or (2) for twenty years without color, either showing is sufficient to establish title in this jurisdiction. C. S., 428 and 430;Power Co. v. Taylor, 191 N.C. 329, 131 S.E. 646; S. c., 194 N.C. 231.

For the errors, as indicated, a new trial must be awarded, and it is so ordered.

New trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. Downs
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 22, 1928
Citation: 141 S.E. 570
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.