History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dikes v. De Cordova
17 Tex. 618
Tex.
1856
Check Treatment
Wheeler, J.

There manifestly is no error in the judgment. The certificate of the Notary shows that the answers of the plaintiff to the interrogatories propounded to him by the defendants, were sworn to and subscribed before the officer; and the certificate is strictly in conformity to the statute. (Hart. Dig. Art. 739.) The answers were filed more than a year before the trial; and the motion to reject certain of them, and take the interrogatories as confessed for the want of an answer, came too late. (8 Tex. R. 129.) ' The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Dikes v. De Cordova
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 17 Tex. 618
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.