History
  • No items yet
midpage
Diez v. State
157 Tex. Crim. 275
| Tex. Crim. App. | 1952
|
Check Treatment
248 S.W.2d 486 (1952)

DIEZ
v.
STATE.

No. 25774.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1952.

Wm. E. Davenport, San Angelo, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction carrying a punishment of six months in jail as a second offender for the offense of drunk driving.

The prior conviction was alleged to have occurred in the County Court of Irion County upon a complaint.

To support that allegation the state introduced in evidence the complaint and the judgment of the County Court of Irion County adjudicating appellant guilty of the offense of drunk driving.

No information was offered in evidence or shown to have been filed in the County Court of Irion County upon the complaint mentioned. The record does not reflect that the county court judgment was authorized to be rendered upon the complaint, alone.

An information is necessary to confer jurisdiction upon a county court to try, originally, a criminal case. Art. V, Sec. 17, Constitution of Texas, Vernon's Ann. St.; Art. 29, C.C.P., Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Art. 29; Kneedler v. State, 131 Tex. Crim. 385, 99 S.W.2d 605; Day v. State, 127 Tex. Crim. 19, 74 S.W.2d 699; Steinman v. State, 153 Tex. Crim. 198, 220 S.W.2d 887.

We are constrained to agree with the appellant that the proof fails to show a prior conviction against him authorizing the enhancement of punishment.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Diez v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 7, 1952
Citation: 157 Tex. Crim. 275
Docket Number: 25774
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.