2. Fraud, § 100*—when evidence as to worthlessness of note improperly excluded. In an action for damages for fraudulently representing that a note and mortgage accepted by plaintiff on an exchange were good and that the maker was solvent, held that evidence that defendant had, prior to the exchange, traded the note to a third person who, upon finding that the note was worthless, compelled defendant to take it back upon threat of a criminal prosecution, was improperly excluded.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
