History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead
393 U.S. 409
SCOTUS
1969
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Dickinson v. First National Bank of Homestead
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 27, 1969
Citation: 393 U.S. 409
Docket Number: 741
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.