Dice v. Inwood Hills CondominiumDice v. Inwood Hills Condominium
In
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
”[W]aiver is the voluntary abandonment or relinquishment of a known right, which, except for such waiver, the party would have enjoyed” (P & D Cards & Gifts v Matejka,
Moreover, questions of fact exist as to whether the appellant Board of Managers of Inwood Hills Condominium failed to enforce the no-pets provision of the rules and regulations, and whether the Board made representations to the plaintiffs that the no-pets provision was not enforced, thereby waiving its right to enforce a no-pet rule against the plaintiffs. Thompson, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.