Diaz v. State

Jul 26, 1985
No. 84-693
Versions:474 So. 2d 173
1985 Ala. LEXIS 4055

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED.

FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, and ADAMS, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C.J., concurs specially.



Concurrence Opinion

TORBERT, Chief Justice

(concurring specially).

I agree that the writ should be denied. However, I wish to point out that I do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion that the factual statement of the disciplinary court is ■ inadequate. I agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion, 474 So.2d 171, that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in circuit court on the merits of his allegations only because he was allegedly denied an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses at the disciplinary hearing.