History
  • No items yet
midpage
Diaz-Kamen v. Blydenburgh
831 N.Y.S.2d 728
N.Y. App. Div.
2007
Check Treatment

In the Matter of CAROL DIAZ-KAMEN, Petitioner, v DONALD R. BLYDENBURGH, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division

831 NYS2d 728

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Donald R. Blydenburgh, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to issue a written decision with respect to certain matrimonial issues.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Schmidt, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Diaz-Kamen v. Blydenburgh
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 3, 2007
Citation: 831 N.Y.S.2d 728
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In