History
  • No items yet
midpage
Diane v. Ponder
252 Ark. 414
Ark.
1972
Check Treatment
Lyle Brown, Justice.

Petitioner was charged in the Newport Municipal Court with the offense of disturbing the peace. She filed a motion to quash the affidavit for warrant of arrest and the warrant itself. The motions were overruled and she was convicted. She appealed to the Jackson County Circuit Court where she renewed her motions to quash. When they were overruled she filed in this court her petition for a writ of prohibition. Prohibition does not lie unless the court is wholly without jurisdiction of the subject matter, or where there is no adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise. State ex rel Purcell v. Nelson, 246 Ark. 210, 438 S.W. 2d 33 (1969).

The jurisdiction of the respondent to try the accused was not affected by any deficiency in the affidavit for warrant or the warrant itself. Cassady v. State, 249 Ark. 1040, 463 S.W. 2d 96 (1971); Estes v. State, 246 Ark. 1145, 442 S.W. 2d 221 (1969); Perkins v. City of Little Rock, 232 Ark. 739, 339 S.W. 2d 859 (1960). Finally, it cannot be questioned that petitioner, had she been convicted in circuit court, would have had a right to appeal.

We have not overlooked the citations of authority from federal jurisdictions. They deal mostly with search warrants. Others interpret the federal rules of. criminal procedure. We are convinced that our cited holdings are not repugnant to any decision of the United States Supreme Court.

Petition denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Diane v. Ponder
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: May 1, 1972
Citation: 252 Ark. 414
Docket Number: 5-5854
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.