History
  • No items yet
midpage
Diamond v. United States
94 F.2d 1012
6th Cir.
1938
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

It appearing upon the record in these appeals that evidence procured by wire tapping constituted a vital factor in the conviction of appellants, and that such testimony is forbidden by section 605 of the Federal Communication Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.A. § 605 (see Frank Carmine Nardone et al. v. United States of America, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. -, decided by the Supreme Court December 20, 1937), it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgments appealed from be, and the same are, reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court for new; trials.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Diamond v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 17, 1938
Citation: 94 F.2d 1012
Docket Number: Nos. 7746-7755
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.