History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dia-Log Co. v. Pareti
126 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App.
1961
Check Treatment
SAMUEL, Judge.

The appellant did not make an appearance when this case was regularly called for argument, nor has he filed a brief herein. The appellee alone has appeared and he has submitted the case and moved that the judgment be affirmed.

Since the appellant has not pointed out any error in the judgment of the lower court, that judgment may be affirmed under the presumption that it is correct. Perkins v. Buchler, 223 La. 179, 65 So.2d 130; Succession of Bailey, 232 La. 824, 95 So.2d 326; Alice v. Woods, La.App., 124 So.2d 770 and Rex Finance Co. v. Morehead, La.App., 124 So.2d 776, both handed down by us on December 5, 1960, and not yet reported.

We have examined the record and find no error of law or fact patent on the face .thereof.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Dia-Log Co. v. Pareti
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 23, 1961
Citation: 126 So. 2d 197
Docket Number: No. 15
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.