Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse University
112 N.E. 1072 | NY | 1916
Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified answered in the negative; remaining questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. *642