History
  • No items yet
midpage
Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders
745 A.2d 540
N.J.
2000
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 322 N.J.Super. 487, 731 A.2d 519 (1999).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 1, 2000
Citation: 745 A.2d 540
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In