History
  • No items yet
midpage
Di Costanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.
275 A.2d 740
| N.J. | 1971
|
Check Treatment
58 N.J. 159 (1971)
275 A.2d 740

FIORE DI COSTANZO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 25, 1971.
Reargued April 5, 1971.
Decided April 12, 1971.

Mrs. Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for appellant (Pellettieri and Rabstein, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Gladstone, on the brief).

Mr. Fred R. Daniels argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John W. Taylor, attorney; Mr. Fred R. Daniels, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division whose opinion is reported in 110 N.J. Super. 383 (1970) is affirmed.

For affirmance — Justices FRANCIS, HALL and MOUNTAIN — 3.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS and PROCTOR — 3.

Case Details

Case Name: Di Costanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 12, 1971
Citation: 275 A.2d 740
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.