DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse

| N.J. | Apr 2, 1974

64 N.J. 548" court="N.J." date_filed="1974-04-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/dhm-industries-v-central-port-warehouse-1934796?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1934796">64 N.J. 548 (1974) 318 A.2d 19" court="N.J." date_filed="1974-04-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/dhm-industries-v-central-port-warehouse-1934796?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1934796">318 A.2d 19

D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 19, 1974. Decided April 2, 1974.

Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.