History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dewsnap v. Davidson
18 R.I. 98
R.I.
1892
Check Treatment

The court is of the opinion that the demurrer to the replication should be overruled. The plaintiffs were not barred by the decree in the lien suit from bringing an action for the damages sustained by the failure of the defendant to comply with his contract. While they might have offered evidence in the lien suit to recoup the damages sustained they were not bound to do so, but were at liberty to reserve their claim and to bring suit on it as they have done. Ives v. Van Epps, 22 Wend. 155, 157;Gillespie v. Torrance, 25 N.Y. 306, 310; Britton v. Turner, 6 N.H. 481, 495; Austin v. Foster, 9 Pick. 341, 346; Ward v. Fellers,3 Mich. 281, 291; Van Epps v. Harrison, 40 Amer. Decis. 314, 326, note.

Demurrer overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Dewsnap v. Davidson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Dec 8, 1892
Citation: 18 R.I. 98
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.