History
  • No items yet
midpage
Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.
130 Wash. 707
Wash.
1924
Check Treatment

Dissenting Opinion

Holcomb, J.

(dissenting) — Although I joined in the opinion of the Department, and still concur in that opinion as to the joinder *708of parties, I am now convinced that the opinion is erroneous as to the instruction condemned. In my opinion, the instruction condemned follows the statutes of this state, is correct as a matter of law and justice, and should be approved. Ultimately it will be.

The verdict and judgment should therefore be affirmed.






Rehearing

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 128 Wash. 604, 223 Pac. 1050. The judgment of the superior court is therefore reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 17, 1924
Citation: 130 Wash. 707
Docket Number: No. 18280
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.