DeVore v. LedermanDeVore v. Lederman
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the 90-day notice dated November 19, 2001, served by the defendants on the plaintiff properly conformed to the provisions of
Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to
H. MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, RITTER, CRANE and SKELOS, JJ., concur.