History
  • No items yet
midpage
Devine v. Chicago Railways Co.
189 Ill. App. 435
Ill. App. Ct.
1914
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Negligence, § 208*—when instruction erroneous as omitting element of due care. Where several instructions directed a verdict for the plaintiff if the jury found the facts as therein severally stated, but each instruction omitted entirely the element of the exercise of ordinary care by the deceased for his own safety, the instructions were erroneous and the error could not be cured by other instructions. 4. Instructions, § 119*—when instruction erroneous as not based on evidence. An instruction that submits it to the jury to find if a certain fact exists virtually tells them that there is evidence tending to prove such fact, and if there is no evidence tending to prove it the instruction is calculated to mislead the jury and is erroneous.

Case Details

Case Name: Devine v. Chicago Railways Co.
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Nov 10, 1914
Citation: 189 Ill. App. 435
Docket Number: Gen. No. 19,984
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.