442 P.2d 925 | Utah | 1968
Review of an Industrial Commission award directing payment thereof by plaintiffs. Affirmed.
The applicant for compensation who is a sort of middleman here, carifag little who
The nub of this case: For whom was Hockenbury working at the time he suffered an icy injury to his fundament,—Terminex or Deseret? The Commission chose Deseret. We sustain the Commission on the facts, not necessarily on the well-worn pronouncement that if there is evidence to support the decision of the Commission, together with all reasonable inferences attendant thereto, we affirm,— but on the undisputed fact that at the time of the accident, Hockenbury for a consideration, actually was performing services for Deseret, which at that specific time was his boss, with complete control over his work, and where Hockenbury owed obeisance to Deseret. This, irrespective of the fact that his salary in a somewhat circuitous manner actually was being paid by Deseret through Terminex.