Eric Desbonnet, Appellant, v Mary Rose Desbonnet, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
826 N.Y.S.2d 327
Order dated April 11, 2005
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, a motion pursuant to
The evidence proffered by the plaintiff did not rise to the level of cruel and inhuman treatment (see Bradley v Bradley, 298 AD2d 485 [2002]; Habib v Habib, 278 AD2d 277 [2000]; Biegeleisen v Biegeleisen, 253 AD2d 474 [1998]; cf. Rose v Rose, supra; Fairweather v Fairweather, supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Florio, J.P, Miller, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
