DERRICK BURDEN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2021-KA-00782-SCT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
09/15/2022
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2021; TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LILLIE BLACKMON SANDERS; TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JEFFERY KENDRICK HARNESS, CHRISTOPHER SEPHERN GREEN, PAUL DRAUGHN SULLIVAN; COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WILKINSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER BY: GEORGE T. HOLMES; ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: ALEXANDRA LEBRON; DISTRICT ATTORNEY: RONNIE LEE HARPER; NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY; DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 09/15/2022
BEFORE RANDOLPH, C.J., COLEMAN AND CHAMBERLIN, JJ.
¶1. A Wilkinson County jury convicted Derrick Burden of aggravated assault and acquitted him of arson. The trial court sentenced Burden to ten years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with five years suspended and full credit for time served. After sentencing, Burden filed a motion for a directed verdict, which the court denied. Burden also filed a motion for a new trial, which was deemed denied. Now, he appeals.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2. Burden lived with his girlfriend, Jessica Hayes, for more than a year before they broke up; Hayes asked him to move out. Six months later, Burden approached Hayes while she was working. That evening, Burden stayed at Hayes‘s work until closing time. Hayes avoided Burden, did not engage with him, and got into her car and left. Hayes encountered Burden again later the same evening at the Magnolia Inn motel in Woodville. She testified that she was in a motel room with a former boyfriend, Willie Myers. Hayes further testified that Burden came to the motel and started banging on their door and yelling for her. Hayes claimed she recognized his voice.
¶3. Burden eventually kicked the door in at which time Myers ran to his truck parked nearby. Burden entered the room
¶4. Hayes tried to get to the door when she came to, but Burden pushed her into a mirror. The pair then fell onto and broke a table. Hayes claimed Burden continued striking and choking her. She stated that she could only lie there and that Burden continued threatening to kill her.
¶5. Hayes eventually escaped and went straight to the sheriff‘s office. Hayes then went to the emergency room at Field Memorial Community Hospital in Centreville because she was lightheaded, her face was swollen, and her entire body was sore. Hayes was evaluated and treated for bruises and swelling to her head and body. Photographs were taken of her injuries at the emergency room that night.
¶6. Burden was indicted on one count of aggravated assault under
DISCUSSION
¶7. Burden moved for a directed verdict during his trial and now asks this Court to render an acquittal, to render a conviction for simple assault, and to remand this case for resentencing, or, alternatively, to reverse his conviction and order a new trial. He argues that the State failed to offer evidence that Hayes suffered any serious bodily injury and that the State also failed to present evidence to support an inference that Burden attempted to cause serious bodily injury. He also claims that the evidence was insufficient for a conviction of aggravated assault and, alternatively, that the verdict against him was contrary to the weight of evidence. Burden makes essentially the same argument for both his sufficiency-of-the-evidence and weight-of-the-evidence challenges.
¶8. A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and a challenge to the weight of the evidence are separate issues with different standards of review and require separate analyses. Kirk v. State, 160 So. 3d 685, 695 (¶ 24) (Miss. 2015).
1. Sufficiency of the Evidence
¶9. “A denial of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict is subject to de novo review on appeal.” Id. (citing Daniels v. State, 107 So. 3d 961, 963 (¶ 10) (Miss. 2013)). A denial of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict will be upheld if the verdict is supported by substantial evidence. Id. (¶ 25). “‘Substantial evidence’ is information of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded jurors in the exercise of impartial judgment might have reached different conclusions.” Natchez Elec. & Supply Co. v. Johnson, 968 So. 2d 358, 362 (¶ 12) (Miss. 2007) (quoting Blake v. Clein, 903 So. 2d 710, 731 (¶ 61) (Miss. 2005)). The evidence will be “viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” Daniels, 107 So. 3d at 963 (¶ 11) (citing Johnson v. St. Dominics-Jackson Mem‘l Hosp., 967 So. 2d 20, 22 (Miss. 2007)).
¶10. Burden alleges that the State failed to offer evidence that Hayes suffered any serious bodily injury and that the State failed to present evidence to support an
A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he or she (i) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; (ii) attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm . . . .
¶11. Burden further argues that Hayes suffered injuries that were less severe than did victims in other cases of aggravated assaults. But the statute only requires an attempt to cause serious bodily injury. It does not require the victim to have actually sustained serious bodily injuries. Wilson v. State, 936 So. 2d 357, 365 (¶ 20) (Miss. 2006) (“This Court does not require that an aggressor beat his victim ‘to within an inch of his life in order to be found guilty of aggravated assault.‘” (quoting Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 292 (Miss. 1992))). Further, an assailant‘s hands and feet need not themselves constitute a deadly weapon when viewed in light of
¶12. The record is replete with testimony by Hayes regarding the assault. She testified that she was repeatedly struck by Burden‘s fists, choked, and shoved into a table and mirror. Additionally, she alleges that during the altercation, she lost consciousness. Medical records and photos from the night of the assault were admitted into evidence and documented Hayes‘s injuries. The medical records and pictures indicate a head injury along with bruises. The photos show Hayes with a very swollen head and face and blood on her clothes. A reasonable jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Burden‘s assault of Hayes with his hands constituted an attempt to cause serious bodily injury with a means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm.
¶13. Based on the record, Hayes‘s testimony and exhibits, and viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, any rational juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Burden committed aggravated assault. The verdict was supported by substantial evidence.
2. Weight of the Evidence
¶14. “A motion for a new trial falls within a lower standard of review than does that of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a directed verdict. A motion for a new trial simply challenges the weight of the evidence. The Supreme Court will reverse the lower court‘s denial of a motion for a new trial only if, by doing so, the court abused its discretion.” Daniels, 107 So. 3d at 963 (¶ 12) (quoting Sheffield v. State, 749 So. 2d 123, 127 (¶ 16) (Miss. 1999)). Burden moved for a new trial, but we note that no ruling was made on the motion. It was deemed denied by operation of law based on
¶16. Burden requests a new trial for the same reasons he raised for his sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge. He claims that the medical records in evidence do not show serious injury; among other discrepancies in Hayes‘s testimony, there was no evidence of choking in the record other than Hayes‘s testimony. Plenty of other evidence, however, supported an aggravated assault conviction, regardless of how the jury weighed Hayes‘s testimony about Burden choking her.
¶17. Burden‘s argument here fails for the same reasons that the sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim fails. Without reiterating the entire argument, ample testimony and evidence in the record showed that Burden‘s assaulting Hayes constituted aggravated assault. The statute only requires an attempt to cause serious bodily harm by a means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm.
CONCLUSION
¶18. Because the record showed ample evidence in the form of Hayes‘s testimony, medical records, and photos, viewing it in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to sustain an aggravated assault conviction, and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
¶19. AFFIRMED.
RANDOLPH, C.J., KITCHENS AND KING, P.JJ., MAXWELL, BEAM, CHAMBERLIN, ISHEE AND GRIFFIS, JJ., CONCUR.