History
  • No items yet
midpage
Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina
16-6917
| 4th Cir. | Jan 19, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ginger Bagley Hunsucker, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG *2 MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

Derek Hendricks appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants summary judgment on Hendricks’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, in which Hendricks alleged an Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical condition, and denying Hendricks’ postjudgment motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hendricks v. Casina, No. 5:13-ct- 03090-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2015 & June 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: Derek Hendricks v. Mr. Casina
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 19, 2017
Docket Number: 16-6917
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.