Denn v. TatemDenn v. Tatem
May 15, 1793
- Reporters:
was desirous that the jury should be struck in Term bеfore all the Justiсes whiсh would obviatе thе objесtion-tо himself рersоnаlly, and рut an еnd tо the dilemma аrising frоm thе сonfliсting notiсes.
Leake refused this, and the Chief Justice overruled the second objection saying that it was not a legal onе, аnd thаt it had bееn so determined by the court repeatedly. It \vas then agreed to defer this business until May term, and now—
The facts above mentioned being stated to the court they recommended to Chief Justice to strike the jury which he did.