History
  • No items yet
midpage
Den v. Tatem
1 N.J.L. 190
N.J.
1793
Check Treatment

The Chief Justice was desirous that the jury should be struck in term, before all the justices, which would obviate the objection to himself personally, and put an end to the dilemma arising from the conflicting notices.

Leake refused this, and the Chief Justice overruled the second objection, saying that it was not a legal one, and that it bad been so determined by the co”rt repeatedly. It was then agreed to defer this business until May Term, and now—

The facts above mentioned being stated to the court, they recommended to Chief Justice to strike the jury, which he did.

Note. — As to a judge having been counsel, see 2 Mod. 151; 3 Bl. Com. 361; Co. Litt. 294; 4 Burr. 2303, 2411; in which last case it appears Judge Blackstone, though he had been of counsel with plaintiff, gave his opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Den v. Tatem
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 15, 1793
Citation: 1 N.J.L. 190
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.