20 N.C. 407 | N.C. | 1839
We think that neither exception can be sustained, but that the judgment must be affirmed.
The case of Taylor v. Shufford, 4 Hawks 116, sanctions the principle of the common law, that the sovereign cannot be estopped, as a rule of justice and policy, equally applicable to our institutions as to those of the mother country. The State was therefore at liberty to aver, that at the time the patent to the lessor of the plaintiff emanated, the land had been granted to Blount; and so may consequently the defendant. He cannot be bound to surrender to the plaintiff a possession, which the defendant’s grantor might have withheld from him.
Upon the other question, Fitzrandolph v. Norman, N.
Per. Curiam. Judgment affirmed-