History
  • No items yet
midpage
Demund v. Meade
13 Ariz. 236
Ariz.
1910
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In this cause the appellant has failed to file the printed abstract required by rule 1 of this court (8 Ariz. iv, 71 Pac. vi). The transcript of the reporter’s notes does not serve the purpose of the abstract required by the rule. The purpose of the abstract is to enable each of the justices sitting to have a copy of the record before him, and the requirement of the rule must be complied with. Furthermore, none of the assignments of error is sufficiently alleged.

The appeal is dismissed.

CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Demund v. Meade
Court Name: Arizona Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 2, 1910
Citation: 13 Ariz. 236
Docket Number: Civil No. 1139
Court Abbreviation: Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.