History
  • No items yet
midpage
Demond v. Crary
1 F. 480
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1880
Check Treatment
Benedict, J.

The counter claim made in the prior action and set up in the plea in abatement, is, in legal effect, an action by the plaintiff against this defendant. Fettretch v. McKay, 47 N. Y. 426. Being for the same cause of action as the present suit, it was properly pleaded in abatement and constitutes a good defence. Ins. Co. v. Brune's Assignee, 96 U. S. (6 Otto) 592.

The order permitting the withdrawal of the counter claim in the former action, obtained since the issue was perfected in this suit, and after the same had been noticed for trial by the plaintiff upon the issues tendered by the plea — which order, of course, .is not set up in the pleadings, having been obtained since the commencement of the term at which the cause was noticed for trial — is not sufficient to defeat the plea. The defendant is entitled to judgment dismissing the complaint.

Case Details

Case Name: Demond v. Crary
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
Date Published: Mar 26, 1880
Citation: 1 F. 480
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.