History
  • No items yet
midpage
DeMarco v. Estlow
21 N.J. Super. 356
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1952
|
Check Treatment
21 N.J. Super. 356 (1952)
91 A.2d 272

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 15, 1952.
Decided September 22, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.

Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.

Case Details

Case Name: DeMarco v. Estlow
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Sep 22, 1952
Citation: 21 N.J. Super. 356
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.