DeMarco v. Estlow
91 A.2d 272 | N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1952
ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and SMALLEY.
Mr. James D. Stockwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.