History
  • No items yet
midpage
Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.
650 F.3d 1045
5th Cir.
2011
Check Treatment
Docket
650 F.3d 1045 (2011)

Julie DEMAHY, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ACTAVIS, INC., Individually and as Successor in Interest of Purepac Pharmaceutical Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-31204.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 22, 2011.

Kristine K. Sims, Brian Leonard Glorioso, Richard Alvin Tonry, II, Tonry, Brinson & Glorioso, L.L.C., Slidell, LA, Louis M. Bograd (argued), Center for Constitutional Litigation, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard A. Dean (argued), Irene Childress Keyse-Walker, Kristen Lepke Mayer, Tucker Ellis & West, L.L.P., Cleveland, OH, Elizabeth Haecker Ryan, Lemle & Kelleher, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Joseph Paul Thomas, Linda E. Maichl, Ulmer & Bernel, L.L.P., Cincinnati, OH, for Amicus Curiae.

*1046 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court having reversed the judgment of this Court and remanded this action for further proceedings in light of its opinion in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, ___ U.S. ____, 131 S.Ct. 2567, 180 L.Ed.2d 580 (2011), we vacate the district court's order denying in part the motion to dismiss and remand for the entry of judgment in favor of the defendant-appellant, Actavis, Inc.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Case Details

Case Name: Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 22, 2011
Citation: 650 F.3d 1045
Docket Number: 08-31204
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.