midpage

DeJesus v. AlbaDeJesus v. Alba

New York Court of Appeals
May 6, 2010
144 SSM 16
Versions:14 N.Y.3d 860
928 N.E.2d 409
902 N.Y.S.2d 27

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division properly concluded that no triable issues of fact existed whether defendant driver acted prudently under the circumstances.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Case Details

Case Name: DeJesus v. Alba
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 6, 2010
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 860; 928 N.E.2d 409; 902 N.Y.S.2d 27; 144 SSM 16
Docket Number: 144 SSM 16
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In