History
  • No items yet
midpage
Degaglio v. Bradley Contracting Co.
184 A.D. 243
N.Y. App. Div.
1918
Check Treatment
H. T. Kellogg, J.:

Claimant was injured on August 12, 1914. He did not file a claim for compensation until March 5, 1917, or nearly two years and six months after the injury was received. Unless he has established an estoppel, therefore, his claim is barred. He says that he told the head superintendent of *244his injury at the time, and that he replied: “ We will take care of you.” He also says that he asked the superintendent for payment of compensation, and that he answered: “ Soon as you can work we'll give you an easy job.” Here is no estoppel. There is no fact falsely asserted relying upon which the claimant was induced not to file a claim. It is not at all like the case of Twonko v. Rome Brass & Copper Co. (183 App. Div.. 292), recently decided by this court, in which the claimant was falsely told that a paper signed by him would entitle him to an award. Claimant continued to work until October 2, 1915. He then went to a hospital for an operation. After this he was paid by his employer for about a year. Those payments, however, even though stated to be payments under the Compensation Law, do not help the claimant, for the time to file a claim had passed before they began to be made. They could not have induced claimant not to file a claim.

The award should be reversed.

All concurred.

Award reversed and claim dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Degaglio v. Bradley Contracting Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 1, 1918
Citation: 184 A.D. 243
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.