History
  • No items yet
midpage
Deese v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
67 S.E.2d 751
N.C.
1951
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Tbe evidence disclosed no actionable negligence on the part of defendant. The death of plaintiff’s intestate evidently resulted from his own independent acts in felling the tree across defendant’s tap line and thereafter attempting to cut the tree top or bough in order to release the wire. This is a situation which, under the circumstances here presented, could not have been reasonably foreseen by the defendant. Parker v. R. R., 169 N.C. 68, 85 S.E. 33; Stanley v. Smithfield, 211 N.C. 386, 190 S.E. 207.

The judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Deese v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 28, 1951
Citation: 67 S.E.2d 751
Docket Number: 605
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In