History
  • No items yet
midpage
Decorso v. Calderaro
295 Conn. 919
Conn.
2010
Check Treatment
991 A.2d 564 (2010)
295 Conn. 919

Gail DECORSO
v.
Jamal CALDERARO et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 30, 2010.

Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition.

Laura Pascale Zaino, Hartford and Alfred J. Zullo, East Haven, in opposition.

The plaintiff' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 617, 985 A.2d 349 (2009), is denied.

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Case Details

Case Name: Decorso v. Calderaro
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Mar 30, 2010
Citation: 295 Conn. 919
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.