History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dearden v. Adams
19 R.I. 217
R.I.
1895
Check Treatment

Assuming that the plaintiff was not discharged by the defendant's agent, but left the defendant's employment of her own accord, the testimony shows that she was a minor and, therefore, not bound by the contract to give two weeks notice before quitting the employment of the defendant. We are of the opinion that she is entitled to recover under the general counts, as upon a quantum meruit, the money due her, to wit, $12.19, that sum being presumptively what her labor was reasonably worth. Gaffney v. Hayden, 110 Mass. 137; Whitmarsh v. Hall, 3 Denio, 375.

The statute referred to by the plaintiff, if such a statute exists, which it is claimed entitles an employee discharged without notice to recover double the amount due the employee *Page 218 at the time, has no application; and, moreover, the Common Pleas Division must have found that she was not discharged, and we cannot review that finding.

Case remitted to the Common Pleas Division with direction to enter judgment for the plaintiff for $12.19, with interest from the date of the writ and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Dearden v. Adams
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Oct 23, 1895
Citation: 19 R.I. 217
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.