History
  • No items yet
midpage
DeAndre Jackson v. Earl Barksdale
707 F. App'x 786
| 4th Cir. | 2018
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAndre L’overture Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

DeAndre L’overture Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v. Barksdale , No. 7:17-cv-00031-PMS (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2017). We deny Jackson’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: DeAndre Jackson v. Earl Barksdale
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 2018
Citation: 707 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: 17-7073
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.