History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Clarke
617 So. 2d 402
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1993
|
Check Treatment
617 So.2d 402 (1993)

DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Alfred L. Caliendo, Bruce P. Cotten and Timothy P. Maloney, Appellants,
v.
George C. CLARKE, III, Individually and/or as Trustee UTA DTD 12/23/83, Appellee.

No. 92-2301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1993.

Broome, Kelley, Aldrich & Warren, and Randy D. Ellison; Morgan, Lewis, Bockius and Peter Buscemi, for appellants.

Goodman & Nekvasil, and Kalju Nekvasil, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This case presents the identical issue of the arbitrability of a limitations defense under the standard Dean Witter customer agreement which was involved in Victor v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 606 So.2d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), review denied, 614 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1993), and Marschel v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 609 So.2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), review denied, 617 So.2d 318 (Fla. 1993). The decision below that the dispute must be arbitrated is affirmed on the authority of those decisions, with which we are in complete agreement.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Clarke
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 20, 1993
Citation: 617 So. 2d 402
Docket Number: 92-2301
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.