Deal v. StateDeal v. State
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Matthews
*741 OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Edgar Deal was convicted of armed robbery in violation of
The state has conceded that the court was wrоng in believing that it was without authority to suspend a portion of the 10 year sentence, but contends that the remarks of the court made at sentencing indicate that it would have imposed the 10 year sentence even if it had thought a more lеnient one was legally permissible, and thus any error is harmless. The state further argues that the sentence is not excessive.
We accept the state’s concession that thе 10 year minimum sentence prescribed by
REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Notes
.
Robbery. A person who, by force or violence, or by putting in fear, steals and takes anything of value from the person of another is guilty of robbery, and is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not more than 15 years nor less than one year.
.
Use of firearms during the commission of certain crimes. A persоn who uses or carries a firearm during the commission of a rоbbery, assault, murder, rape, burglary, or kidnapping is guilty of a felony and upon conviction for a first offense is punishable by imprisonment for not less than 10 years. Upon conviction for a second or subsequent offense in violation of this sectiоn, the offender shall be imprisoned for not less than 25 years.
.
Suspension of sentence and probation. Uрon entering a judgment of conviction of a crime, or at any time within 60 days from the date of entry of that judgment of conviction, a court, when satisfied that the ends of justice and the best interest of the public as well as the defendant will be served thereby, may suspend the imposition or execution or bаlance of the sentence or a portion therеof, and place the defendant on probation for a period and upon the terms and conditions as the сourt considers best.
.
Imposing less than prescribed penalty. Except in a case of murder or rape, the court may, upon conviction, when in its opinion the facts and circumstances make the minimum penalty рrovided in this title manifestly too severe, impose a lesser penalty, either of a fine or imprisonment or both. When less than the minimum penalty is imposed, the court shall set out the reasons for its action on the record in the case.
. Gonzales v. State, 582 P.2d 630 (Alaska 1978); Donlun v. State, 527 P.2d 472 (Alaska 1974); Gonzales v. State, 521 P.2d 512 (Alaska 1974); Call v. State, 511 P.2d 135 (Alaska 1973); Speas v. State, 511 P.2d 130 (Alaska 1973).