De Raismes v. Cahill
97 N.J.L. 565
N.J.
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — ’The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenraci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. .