De Pena v. StateDe Pena v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Lattimore
Lead Opinion
Conviction for murder; punishment, death.
It is charged in the indictment herein that appellant “Did then and there voluntarily kill Alfredo Acuna by shooting him with a pistol, against the peace and dignity of the State.” An indictment for murder which does not charge that same was committed with malice aforethought, will not sustain a judgment of conviction carrying with it a penalty greater than five years in the penitentiary. Swilley v. State, No. 12792, opinion December 11, 1929. The indictment in the instant case fails to charge that the murder was committed with malice aforethought.
For the reason mentioned the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Addendum
on motion for rehearing.
LATTIMORE, Judge.We have carefully examined the able brief of the district attorney of El Paso county, and regret our in-, ability to agree with the contentions therein set forth. The matter has been investigated further, and our views will be found expressed in the majority opinion on rehearing in the case of Swilley v. State, this day handed down.
The State’s motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Overruled.