De Oleo v. Charis Christian Ministries, Inc.De Oleo v. Charis Christian Ministries, Inc.
In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries sustained while performing construction work at a building owned and managed by appellants (Charis), for his employer, third-party defendant, St. Loren Construction Corp. (St. Loren).
The motion court correctly found that Charis had failed to
However, Charis submitted sufficient proof that, if plaintiff was injured while performing work on the roof of the building owned by Charis, it was due to the negligence of St. Loren, with no negligence on the part of Charis. Charis did not need to disprove the defense of
Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.