History
  • No items yet
midpage
De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
174 N.Y.S.2d 891
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1958
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy, and for an accounting, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss each of the three causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint as insufficient in law (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [9 Misc 2d 983.]

Case Details

Case Name: De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1958
Citation: 174 N.Y.S.2d 891
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.